But it occurred to me that I could spin up another blog to throw such things into. The problem was that I'm a dilettante, and am interested in a variety of subjects that have little or nothing to do with each other. Which one to blog about? Or should I blog about all of them? And would anyone care about any of them?
This spring Nancy was on a writing retreat with a friend who is reluctantly dipping her toe in the dating pool. The two of them got to talking, and decided that they should encourage me to do a blog about internet dating.
They didn't need to twist my arm -- things have gone so well with Nancy that I want to spread the word, and I spent so much time dating and learning (as I thought) how to do it right, that it seemed a shame to let all of that perspective go to waste. Now someone was agreeing, and so the second blog was born.
Well, that broke the
So now I'm suddenly out of control and blogging up a storm. It ought to be fun for one of us, at least, and I hope it will be for a few others as well.
I think it should be "that broke the blogjam," instead of "logjam" :>
ReplyDeleteGo, Jim! ~ dian
Ooh, you're good, Dian! I'm responsive to my commenters, so I've already implemented your fine suggestion.
ReplyDeletethat was a GREAT suggestion. jim, it is really fun to read your blogs. i haven't delved into the billiards or ball blogs, but am thoroughly enjoying the birding and internet dating blogs. keep up the great work!
ReplyDelete